| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Contact Us
Clin Exp Emerg Med > Volume 4(3); 2017 > Article
Lee, Lee, Kim, Lee, Won, Park, Ahn, Shin, Ohk, Moon, Cho, Park, and Tae: Changes in histopathology and tumor necrosis factor-α levels in the hearts of rats following asphyxial cardiac arrest

Abstract

Objective

Post cardiac arrest (CA) syndrome is associated with a low survival rate in patients who initially have return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after CA. The aim of this study was to examine the histopathology and inflammatory response in the heart during the post CA syndrome.

Methods

We induced asphyxial CA in male Sprague-Dawley rats and determined the survival rate of these rats during the post resuscitation phase.

Results

Survival of the rats decreased after CA: 66.7% at 6 hours, 36.7% at 1 day, and 6.7% at 2 days after ROSC following CA. The rats were sacrificed at 6 hours, 12 hours, 1 day, and 2 days after ROSC, and their heart tissues were examined. Histopathological scores increased at 12 hours post CA and afterwards, histopathological changes were not significant. In addition, levels of tumor necrosis factor-α immunoreactivity gradually increased after CA.

Conclusion

The survival rate of rats 2 days post CA was very low, even though histopathological and inflammatory changes in the heart were not pronounced in the early stage following CA.

INTRODUCTION

Cardiac arrest (CA), also called cardiopulmonary arrest or circulatory arrest, is a sudden cessation in normal blood circulation because the heart has failed to pump blood [1]. Most studies on CA over the past half-century have focused on improving the rate of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), and significant progress has been made. However, even though immediate resuscitation can increase ROSC, prognosis remains poor [2-4]. The low survival rate of patients who have ROSC after CA can be attributed to a unique pathophy siological process [1] known as the post CA syndrome (PCAS). In fact, PCAS is recognized as the main cause of low survival rate after ROSC [3]. The early-phase PCAS survival rate in patients is 4% to 33%, depending on the chain of survival [4]. Such a low survival rate in patients with PCAS seems to result from a combination of whole-body ischemia/reperfusion-mediated damage and nonspecific activation of a systemic inflammatory response by CA and ROSC [2].
Many studies have focused on myocardial and brain injury and dysfunction after CA [5,6]. There is no doubt that the heart is important in PCAS. Recently, Roberts et al. [7] reported that multiple organ dysfunction is common after ROSC in patients with PCAS, and is associated with a low survival rate. Nevertheless, there is a paucity of information on inflammation in and histopathology of hearts after CA. Furthermore, the relationship between survival and cardiac damage remains unclear in cases of PCAS.
Systemic ischemia/reperfusion injury after ROSC triggers the release of inflammatory cytokines, leading to a systemic inflammatory response syndrome that mimics sepsis, even in the absence of infection [8]. The inflammatory response after ROSC is characterized by polymorphonuclear leukocyte activation, adhesion molecule expression, reactive oxygen species production in response to inducible nitric oxide synthase, and release of cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α [9]. However, the mechanisms underlying this response in CA and PCAS remain unclear.
Therefore, the inflammatory response in the heart following CA should be studied, as well as the survival rate in early-phase PCAS. Therefore, we induced asphyxial CA in rats and determined the survival rate during the post resuscitation phase. Moreover, we studied histopathological changes in the heart after ROSC and investigated changes in the levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokine TNF-α after ROSC by immunohistochemistry.

METHODS

Experimental animals and groups

Male Sprague-Dawley rats were obtained from the experimental animal center of Kangwon National University (Chuncheon, South Korea). All experimental protocols were approved based on ethical and scientific guidelines of the University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (approval no. KW-151127-1). Experimental animals were divided into the following groups: 1) sham-CA rats (n=7 for each time point examined), which did not undergo CA procedures but otherwise were treated with the same conditions as the CA group; and 2) CA rats (n=7 for each time point examined), which were subjected to CA procedures. The rats in each group were sacrificed at 6, 12, 24 hours, and 2 days after ROSC.

CA induction and cardiopulmonary resuscitation

CA and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was performed using published procedures [10,11] with minor modifications (Fig. 1). Briefly, rats were anesthetized with 2% to 3% isoflurane and mechanically ventilated using a rodent ventilator (Harvard Apparatus, Holliston, MA, USA) to maintain respiration. To monitor peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), an oxygen saturation probe (Nonin Medical, Plymouth, MN, USA) was attached to the left foot of each rat. Body temperature was maintained at 37±0.5°C during and after the CA procedures. To monitor electrical activity, electrocardiographic probes (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA) were placed (three leads per limb), and electrocardiograms were examined continuously. The left femoral artery and right femoral vein were separately cannulated to monitor mean arterial pressure (MAP) (MLT 1050/D; AD Instruments, Bella Vista, Austria) and administer drugs intravenously.
After 5 minutes of stabilization, vecuronium bromide (2 mg/kg; Gensia Sicor Pharmaceuticals, Irvine, CA, USA) was intravenously administered and anesthesia and mechanical ventilation were stopped. A MAP below 25 mmHg and subsequent pulseless electric activity were used to define CA [11,12]. CA was confirmed at 3 to 4 minutes after vecuronium bromide injection. Five minutes after CA, CPR was initiated by intravenously administering a bolus of epinephrine (0.005 mg/kg) and sodium bicarbonate (1 mEq/kg), followed by mechanical ventilation with 100% oxygen and mechanical chest compressions at a rate of 300/min until MAP reached 60 mmHg and electrocardiographic activity was observed. Once the animal was hemodynamically stable and spontaneously breathing, usually at 1 hour after ROSC, 2 hours after resuscitation, and with rats under anesthesia with isoflurane, the arterial and venous catheters were removed, and the wounds were closed. The rats were then mechanically ventilated with ambient air and allowed to extubate themselves. After extubation, the rats were returned to their cages and monitored closely for long-term outcomes. Thereafter, animals were subcutaneously administered 20 mL/kg/day isotonic saline with 5% dextrose until they could eat and drink without assistance. Sham animals received the same treatment except for the induction of CA and administration of CPR.

H&E staining and TNF-α immunohistochemistry

H&E staining and TNF-α immunohistochemistry were performed according to published procedures developed in our laboratory [13]. In short, animals were anesthetized with 30 mg/kg Zoletil 50 (Virbac, Carros, France) and perfused transcardially with 4% paraformaldehyde. Hearts were cut sagittally, embedded in paraffin, and then sectioned (6 µm).
To examine histopathological changes, the sections were stained with H&E, dehydrated in an ethanol series, and mounted with Canada balsam (Kanto Chemical, Tokyo, Japan). The histopathology of heart lesions was semiquantitatively assessed using a published procedure [14]. In brief, we counted cells with eosinophilic cytoplasms, darker nuclei, cytoplasmic vacuolization, infiltration, and congestion. Cells with these effects in lesions were graded using the following scale: 0, none; 1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe.
To examine changes in TNF-α levels, tissue sections were incubated with rabbit anti-TNF-α (diluted 1:500; Abcam Incorporated, Cambridge, MA, USA), followed by addition of secondary antibody (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA), and then developed using Vectastain ABC (Vector Laboratories) and visualized using 3,3′-diaminobenzidine.
To quantitatively analyze TNF-α immunoreactivity, five microscope fields (×200 magnification) in the posterior wall of the left ventricle and septum of the heart were randomly selected, and the staining intensities of TNF-α-immunoreactive structures were evaluated based on the optical density (OD) obtained after transformation of the mean level of gray using the formula: OD=log (256/mean gray level). The OD of the background was establishing using areas adjacent to the evaluated area. After the background density was subtracted, ratios of ODs in the image files were calibrated in Photoshop ver. 8.0 (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA, USA), and presented as percentages, with ODs of stained tissues from rats in the sham-CA group set at 100% in NIH Image ver. 1.59 (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).

Statistical analysis

All data were entered into SAS ver. 9.02 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) and presented as means±standard error of the mean (SEM). Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier statistic and log-rank test. MAP and peripheral oxygen levels were compared by one- and two-way repeated measures ANOVAs to assess the effects of time. To determine the significance of differences, post hoc Tukey testing was conducted for all pairwise multiple comparisons. For semiquantitative analyses of histopathology and TNF-α immunoreactivity, differences were considered significant when P-values were less than 0.05.

RESULTS

Physiological variables and survival rate

There was no significant difference between baseline characteristics, including body weights, MAP, and SpO2, of rats in the two groups. CA was induced 3 to 4 minutes after intravenous injection of vecuronium bromide (2 mg/kg) and confirmed with isoeletric electrocardiograms and SpO2 and MAP measurements (Fig. 2). Electrocardiograms, SpO2, and MAP changed as expected in the experimental protocol. Baseline and post ROSC physiologic variables are shown in Table 1 (P<0.05 vs. baseline). Body temperatures were the same as those at baseline or after ROSC (Table 1).
The survival rate in rats was determined 2 days after CA. Results are shown in Fig. 3. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a severe reduction in survival (P<0.05). The survival rate of rats was 66.7% at 12 hours after ROSC and decreased to 36.7% 1 day after ROSC. Two days after ROSC, the survival rate was 6.7%.

Histopathological changes

Heart histopathology following CA was examined by H&E staining (Fig. 4). The infiltration of inflammatory cells was apparent in the cardiac parenchyma beginning 6 hours after CA, and degeneration around vessels was found beginning 12 hours after CA. Histopathological scores increased significantly (P<0.05) at 12 hours after CA relative to those in the sham-CA group, and scores were maintained after that time.

TNF-α immunoreactivity

In this study, the inflammatory response after ROSC was assessed by TNF-α immunohistochemistry (Fig. 5). In the sham-CA group, TNF-α immunoreactivity was low in cardiac tissue, and few TNF-α immunoreactive cells were observed in the connective tissue. However, the number of TNF-α-immunoreactive cells increased significantly (P<0.05) beginning 1 day post CA compared with that in the sham-CA group (Fig. 5).

DISCUSSION

The survival rate of patients with out-of-hospital CAs who were administered CPR by ambulance staff was reported to be 14.6% to 39% in cases who survived through admission, with half of them dying within the first 24 hours in the hospital [15]. Che et al. [12] reported a survival rate of about 40% 2 days after ROSC in a rat model of asphyxial CA, whereas Kida et al. [16] reported that all mice died within 1 day of ROSC in a mouse model of potassium-induced CA. In our present study, survival immediately decreased after ROSC, reaching 6.7% at 2 days after ROSC. As described above, the survival rate following CA in animal models differs according to the methods or animals used. In this study, histopathological evaluations of the heart were performed in the early stage of PCAS because the survival rate was shown to decrease significantly 2 days after ROSC.
In the present study, histopathological scores in hearts following induction of CA increased beginning 12 hours after CA, and scores were maintained after this time. Hayashida et al. [17] reported perivascular and interstitial fibrosis on the endocardial side of the myocardium 1 day after ROSC in a rat model of CA; however, the histological damage did not seem to be severe. On the other hand, in swine studies, coronary blood flow was found not to be reduced in the 30 minutes after ROSC, even though significant dysfunction occurred during this period, indicating a stunning phenomenon rather than permanent injury or infarction [3].
Inflammatory cytokines play important roles in the pathophysiology of PCAS and have been implicated in myocardial and brain dysfunction in the early post-CA period [18,19]. In particular, an increase in pro-inflammatory cytokine levels has been reported following resuscitation [20]. TNF-α level increases shortly after ROSC and is predictive of early death; specifically, plasma levels of TNF-α are inversely correlated with myocardial function after CA [21]. TNF-α, which is a pro-inflammatory cytokine and master regulator of the inflammatory response, is produced primarily by macrophages but also by a broad variety of cells, including lymphoid cells, mast cells, endothelial cells, myocytes, adipose tissue, fibroblasts, and neurons, following CA [18]. Recently, TNF-α protein levels were shown to be increased in the left ventricles of hearts 6 hours after CA [10,21]. In addition, Qi et al. [22] reported a significant increase in TNF-α protein levels in the lungs of an animal model of cardiopulmonary bypass. In our present study, we found that the number of TNF-α immunoreactive cells increased in hearts after CA, although this immunoreactivity and histopathology were not pronounced.
The survival rate of rats with asphyxial CA was very low at 2 days post CA (66.7% at 6 hours, 36.7% at 1 day, and 6.7% 2 days after ROSC following CA). However, histopathological and inflammatory changes in the heart were not pronounced in the early stage after CA. Therefore, the factors that determine the low survival rate after ROSC should be further examined in animal models of CA.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the Basic Science Research Program of the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), which is funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2014R1A1A2057263), and by a 2015 Research Grant from Kangwon National University.

REFERENCES

1. Girotra S, Chan PS, Bradley SM, et al. Post-resuscitation care following out-of-hospital and in-hospital cardiac arrest. Heart 2015.
crossref pmid pmc
2. Mongardon N, Dumas F, Ricome S, et al. Postcardiac arrest syndrome: from immediate resuscitation to long-term outcome. Ann Intensive Care 2011; 1:45.
crossref pmid pmc
3. Neumar RW, Nolan JP, Adrie C, et al. Post-cardiac arrest syndrome: epidemiology, pathophysiology, treatment, and prognostication. A consensus statement from the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (American Heart Association, Australian and New Zealand Council on Resuscitation, European Resuscitation Council, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, InterAmerican Heart Foundation, Resuscitation Council of Asia, and the Resuscitation Council of Southern Africa); the American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee; the Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia; the Council on Cardiopulmonary, Perioperative, and Critical Care; the Council on Clinical Cardiology; and the Stroke Council. Circulation 2008; 118:2452-83.
crossref pmid
4. Lopez-Herce J, del Castillo J, Matamoros M, et al. Post return of spontaneous circulation factors associated with mortality in pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest: a prospective multicenter multinational observational study. Crit Care 2014; 18:607.
crossref pmid pmc
5. Laurent I, Monchi M, Chiche JD, et al. Reversible myocardial dysfunction in survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40:2110-6.
crossref pmid
6. Madl C, Holzer M. Brain function after resuscitation from cardiac arrest. Curr Opin Crit Care 2004; 10:213-7.
crossref pmid
7. Roberts BW, Kilgannon JH, Chansky ME, et al. Multiple organ dysfunction after return of spontaneous circulation in postcardiac arrest syndrome. Crit Care Med 2013; 41:1492-501.
crossref pmid
8. Bro-Jeppesen J, Kjaergaard J, Wanscher M, et al. Systemic inflammatory response and potential prognostic implications after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a substudy of the target temperature management trial. Crit Care Med 2015; 43:1223-32.
crossref pmid
9. Bro-Jeppesen J, Kjaergaard J, Wanscher M, et al. The inflammatory response after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is not modified by targeted temperature management at 33 degrees C or 36 degrees C. Resuscitation 2014; 85:1480-7.
crossref pmid
10. Drabek T, Janata A, Wilson CD, et al. Minocycline attenuates brain tissue levels of TNF-alpha produced by neurons after prolonged hypothermic cardiac arrest in rats. Resuscitation 2014; 85:284-91.
crossref pmid pmc
11. Han F, Boller M, Guo W, et al. A rodent model of emergency cardiopulmonary bypass resuscitation with different temperatures after asphyxial cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2010; 81:93-9.
crossref pmid
12. Che D, Li L, Kopil CM, Liu Z, Guo W, Neumar RW. Impact of therapeutic hypothermia onset and duration on survival, neurologic function, and neurodegeneration after cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med 2011; 39:1423-30.
crossref pmid pmc
13. Jia X, Koenig MA, Shin HC, et al. Improving neurological outcomes post-cardiac arrest in a rat model: immediate hypothermia and quantitative EEG monitoring. Resuscitation 2008; 76:431-42.
crossref pmid pmc
14. Acikgoz S, Edebali N, Barut F, et al. Ischemia modified albumin increase indicating cardiac damage after experimental subarachnoid hemorrhage. BMC Neurosci 2014; 15:33.
crossref pmid pmc
15. Cobbe SM, Dalziel K, Ford I, Marsden AK. Survival of 1476 patients initially resuscitated from out of hospital cardiac arrest. BMJ 1996; 312:1633-7.
crossref pmid pmc
16. Kida K, Shirozu K, Yu B, Mandeville JB, Bloch KD, Ichinose F. Beneficial effects of nitric oxide on outcomes after cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation in hypothermia-treated mice. Anesthesiology 2014; 120:880-9.
crossref pmid pmc
17. Hayashida K, Sano M, Kamimura N, et al. H(2) gas improves functional outcome after cardiac arrest to an extent comparable to therapeutic hypothermia in a rat model. J Am Heart Assoc 2012; 1:e003459.
crossref pmid pmc
18. Youngquist ST, Niemann JT, Shah AP, Thomas JL, Rosborough JP. A comparison of model of ventricular fibrillation. Resuscitation 2013; 84:999-1003.
crossref pmid pmc
19. Youngquist ST, Niemann JT, Heyming TW, Rosborough JP. The central nervous system cytokine response to global ischemia following resuscitation from ventricular fibrillation in a porcine model. Resuscitation 2009; 80:249-52.
crossref pmid
20. Adrie C, Adib-Conquy M, Laurent I, et al. Successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation after cardiac arrest as a "sepsis-like" syndrome. Circulation 2002; 106:562-8.
crossref pmid
21. Zhao ZG, Tang ZZ, Zhang WK, Li JG. Protective effects of embelin on myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury following cardiac arrest in a rabbit model. Inflammation 2015; 38:527-33.
crossref pmid
22. Qi D, Gao MX, Yu Y. Intratracheal antitumor necrosis factor-alpha antibody attenuates lung tissue damage following cardiopulmonary bypass. Artif Organs 2013; 37:142-9.
crossref pmid

Fig. 1.
Schematic of experimental procedures, including measurements obtained at baseline (BL), induction of asphyxial cardiac arrest (CA), administration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC).
ceem-17-220f1.tif
Fig. 2.
(A) Electrocardiogram (ECG) from a representative animal obtained at baseline (BL), asphyxia induction (AI), cardiac arrest (CA), and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Pulseless electrical activity is shown during CA, although it is often visible during CA in our model. (B) SpO2 levels are shown during CA, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), and ROSC. (C) Mean arterial pressure is shown during CA, CPR, and ROSC.
ceem-17-220f2.tif
Fig. 3.
Cumulative survival rate calculated by a Kaplan-Meier analysis in the sham- and cardiac arrest (CA) groups 2 days after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). The survival of rats in the CA group was significantly different from that in the sham-CA group (log-rank test, P<0.05).
ceem-17-220f3.tif
Fig. 4.
Hematotoxylin and eosin staining of heart tissue. (A) Sham-CA group. (B) The infiltration of inflammatory cells between cardiomyocytes at 6 hours after cardiac arrest (CA) is shown. (C) Cardiac lesion increased at 12 hours post CA. (D,E) Cardiac lesions at 1 and 2 days after CA. (F) Heart lesion score (*P<0.05, significantly different from the sham-CA group). The bars indicate means±standard error of the mean. Scale bar=50 μm.
ceem-17-220f4.tif
Fig. 5.
Immunohistochemical staining for tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α in the heart. (A) Sham-CA group. (B,C) TNF-α expression in cells at 6 and 12 hours after cardiac arrest. (D,E) TNF-α expression in cells increased at 1 and 2 days post cardiac arrest (CA). (F) Relative optical density (ROD) of TNF-α immunoreacitve cells (*P<0.05, significantly different from the sham-CA group). The bars indicate means±standard error of the mean. Scale bar=50 μm.
ceem-17-220f5.tif
Table 1.
Physiological variables
Baseline ROSC 6 hr ROSC 12 hr ROSC 1 day ROSC 2 day
Body weight (g) 295.9 ± 15 294.8 ± 39 294.4 ± 38 291 ± 56 288 ± 34
Mean arterial pressure (mmHg) 119 ± 14 114 ± 23 109 ± 24 112 ± 31 115 ± 35
Heart rate (beats/min) 335 ± 14 354 ± 23 329 ± 72 307 ± 41 349 ± 56
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation time (min) 1.5 ± 0.4 1.6 ± 0.3 1.6 ± 0.4 1.4 ± 0.6 1.5 ± 0.4

Values are presented as mean±standard error of the mean.

ROSC, return of spontaneous circulation.

Editorial Office
The Korean Society of Emergency Medicine
101-3305, Brownstone Seoul, 464 Cheongpa-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul 06351, Korea
TEL: +82-70-8882-1333   FAX: +82-2-3676-1339   E-mail: office@ceemjournal.org
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers
Copyright © by The Korean Society of Emergency Medicine. All rights reserved.                 powerd by m2community