Objective Rapid determination of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the emergency department (ED) is very important for patients presenting with ischemic symptoms. The aim of this study was to determine the predictive value of HEART score for ACS and significant coronary artery stenosis (SCS).
Methods We retrospectively analyzed data of patients who visited the ED with chest discomfort and were admitted to the cardiology department. Enrolled patients were classified into ACS and non-ACS groups according to their discharge diagnosis. Patients who underwent imaging were further divided into SCS and non-SCS groups according to study results. We compared age, sex, vital signs, risk factors, electrocardiogram, troponin, and HEART score for each group. For ACS and SCS predictive performance, the test characteristics of HEART score was calculated using sensitivity, specificity, predictive value, likelihood ratio, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.
Results Of 207 patients, 112 had ACS. Among enrolled patients, 155 underwent imaging workup, of whom 67 had SCS. HEART score ≤3 had 93% sensitivity for ACS and 97% for SCS. HEART score ≥7 had 82% specificity for ACS and 83% for SCS. HEART score area under ROC curve for ACS was 0.706 (95% confidence interval, 0.627–0.776) and 0.737 (95% confidence interval, 0.660–0.804) for SCS.
Conclusion HEART score was a fair predictor of ACS and SCS in ED patients who presented with chest symptoms and were admitted to the cardiology department. The predictive power of HEART score was better for SCS than for ACS.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Diagnostic Accuracy Improvement of an Updated HEART Score to Predict Coronary Artery Disease as Detected by Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Michele Della Rocca, Stefano Ferdico, Nicola Cosentino, Alice Bonomi, Andrea Baggiano, Manuela Muratori, Saima Mushtaq, Laura Salvini, Matteo Biroli, Edona Leka, Gianluca Pontone, Marco Grazi, Emilio Assanelli Journal of Clinical Medicine.2026; 15(4): 1424. CrossRef
Retrospective analysis of the performance of the PROMISE minimal risk tool for patients presenting with recent onset stable chest pain Conor Tuffs, Natasha Khullar, Terry Levy, Vivek Kodoth, Rosie Swallow, Peter O’Kane, Jehangir Din, Chun Shing Kwok, Nick Curzen, Jonathan Hinton Open Heart.2026; 13(1): e003837. CrossRef
A Cross-Sectional Study on the Relationship between the HEART Score and the Severity of CAD using the SYNTAX Score in Patients with NSTEMI Admitted to the Emergency Department: A Study from Turkey MS Pepele, I Aktas, O Demiroz, S Derya, E Yildirim, MN Bilen, B Demir Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice.2025; 28(6): 758. CrossRef
Role of HEART score in prediction of coronary artery disease and major adverse cardiac events in patients presenting with chest pain Tanja Stojkovic, Eva Stojkovic, Dejan Sakac, Aleksandar Redzek, Anastazija Stojsic-Milosavljevic, Lazar Velicki, Biljana Parapid Srpski arhiv za celokupno lekarstvo.2022; 150(3-4): 149. CrossRef
Recently, the number of Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases has increased remarkably in South Korea, so the triage clinics and emergency departments (ED) are expected to be overcrowded with patients with presumed infection. As of March 21st, there was a total of 8,799 confirmed cases of COVID-19 and 102 related deaths in South Korea that was one of the top countries with high incidence rates [1]. This sharp increase in infection is associated with 1) outbreaks in individual provinces, 2) deployment of rapid and aggressive screening tests, 3) dedicated healthcare staffs for virus screening tests, 4) quarantine inspection data transparency and accurate data reporting, and 5) public health lessons from previous Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) outbreaks. This commentary introduces innovative screening tests that are currently used in South Korea for COVID-19, e.g., Drive-Through and Walk-Through tests, and compare the advantages and disadvantages of both methods.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
PID air pressure controller in a positive pressure screening cabinet (PPS-Cabinet) for healthcare operator screening of SARS-CoV-2 infection Sommas Kaewluan, Nathawat Unsomsri, Songkran Wiriyasart Perioperative Care and Operating Room Management.2025; 40: 100497. CrossRef
Repurposing phone booths into COVID-19 sampling stations: medical operator experiences Martin Schoch, Sunaree Lawanyawatna International Journal for Equity in Health.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Effective Response to a Regional Outbreak of COVID-19: Experience of a Tertiary Emergency Center Sungbae Moon, Hyun Wook Ryoo, Jae Wan Cho, Haewon Jung Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Critical Concepts for COVID-19 Mass Vaccination Site Operations Scott A. Goldberg, David Callaway, Daniel Resnick-Ault, Sujal Mandavia, Rodrigo Martinez, Michelle Bass, Eric Goralnick Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
COVID-19 Drive-Through Point of Screening and Testing (POST) System: A Safe, Efficient, and Adaptable Model for Nasopharyngeal Swab Collection Lauran K. Evans, Austin Shinagawa, Sarah Sutton, Lisa Calvo Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness.2022; 16(1): 194. CrossRef
Lessons Learned From an Analysis of the Emergency Medical Services’ COVID-19 Drive-Through Testing Facilities in Israel Itay Zmora, Evan Avraham Alpert, Uri Shacham, Nisim Mishraki, Eli Jaffe Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness.2022; 16(5): 2091. CrossRef
Positive Pressure Testing Booths Development and Deployment in Response to the COVID-19 Outbreak Kevin Aroom, Jiawei Ge, Lidia Al-Zogbi, Marcee White, Adrienne Trustman, Adena Greenbaum, Jason Farley, Axel Krieger Journal of Medical Devices.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Bridging values: Finding a balance between privacy and control. The case of Corona apps in Belgium and the Netherlands Rosamunde van Brakel, Olya Kudina, Chiara Fonio, Kees Boersma Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management.2022; 30(1): 50. CrossRef
Viral Etiological Agent(s) of Respiratory Tract Infections in Symptomatic Individuals during the Second Wave of COVID-19 Pandemic: A Single Drive-Thru Mobile Collection Site Study Aleksandra Kozinska, Karolina Wegrzynska, Magdalena Komiazyk, Jaroslaw Walory, Izabela Wasko, Anna Baraniak Pathogens.2022; 11(4): 475. CrossRef
A 12-month retrospective study of outcomes of COVID-19 drive-through swabbing hubs’ screening of asymptomatic population in Qatar Mohamed G. Al-Kuwari, Mariam A. Abdulmalik, Azza M. Mohammed, Shaikha Abushaikha, Mujeeb C. Kandy Journal of Global Health Reports.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
A systematic review of strategies adopted to scale up COVID-19 testing in low-, middle- and high-income countries Winters Muttamba, Bernadette Ann-Marie O'Hare, Vibhor Saxena, Mudarshiru Bbuye, Parul Tyagi, Andrew Ramsay, Bruce Kirenga, Wilber Sabiiti BMJ Open.2022; 12(11): e060838. CrossRef
Effective Management of the Rapid Spread of the COVID-19 Virus in South Korea: Social and Institutional Learning from MERS Kwangho Jung Public Administration Quarterly.2022; 46(4): 384. CrossRef
COVID-19 screening center models in South Korea Ji Eon Kim, Ji Ho Lee, Hocheol Lee, Seok Jun Moon, Eun Woo Nam Journal of Public Health Policy.2021; 42(1): 15. CrossRef
Identifying patients with symptoms suspicious for COVID-19 at elevated risk of adverse events: The COVAS score Adam L. Sharp, Brian Z. Huang, Benjamin Broder, Matthew Smith, George Yuen, Christopher Subject, Claudia Nau, Beth Creekmur, Sara Tartof, Michael K. Gould The American Journal of Emergency Medicine.2021; 46: 489. CrossRef
SARS-CoV-2 Wave Two Surveillance in East Asia and the Pacific: Longitudinal Trend Analysis Lori Ann Post, Jasmine S Lin, Charles B Moss, Robert Leo Murphy, Michael G Ison, Chad J Achenbach, Danielle Resnick, Lauren Nadya Singh, Janine White, Michael J Boctor, Sarah B Welch, James Francis Oehmke Journal of Medical Internet Research.2021; 23(2): e25454. CrossRef
Flattening the Curve on COVID-19: South Korea’s Measures in Tackling Initial Outbreak of Coronavirus Daejoong Lee, Kyungmoo Heo, Yongseok Seo, Hyerim Ahn, Kyungran Jung, Sohyun Lee, Hyeseung Choi American Journal of Epidemiology.2021; 190(4): 496. CrossRef
SARS-CoV-2 detection by self-testing: A method to improve surveillance programmes Paula Iruzubieta, Jeffrey V. Lazarus, Javier Crespo Gastroenterología y Hepatología.2021; 44(6): 395. CrossRef
Feasibility of large-scale population testing for SARS-CoV-2 detection by self-testing at home Paula Iruzubieta, Tatiana Fernández-Lanas, Laura Rasines, Lorena Cayon, Ana Álvarez-Cancelo, Alvaro Santos-Laso, Agustín García-Blanco, Soraya Curiel-Olmo, Joaquín Cabezas, Reinhard Wallmann, Emilio Fábrega, Víctor M. Martínez-Taboada, José L. Hernández, Scientific Reports.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
How social innovations spread globally through the process of reverse innovation: a case-study from the South Korea Chiara Cannavale, Lorenza Claudio, Michele Simoni Italian Journal of Marketing.2021; 2021(4): 421. CrossRef
SARS-CoV-2 detection by self-testing: A method to improve surveillance programmes Paula Iruzubieta, Jeffrey V. Lazarus, Javier Crespo Gastroenterología y Hepatología (English Edition).2021; 44(6): 395. CrossRef
Predicted Impact of Vaccination and Active Case Finding Measures to Control Epidemic of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in a Migrant-Populated Area in Thailand Rapeepong Suphanchaimat, Natthaprang Nittayasoot, Panithee Thammawijaya, Pard Teekasap, Kumnuan Ungchusak Risk Management and Healthcare Policy.2021; Volume 14: 3197. CrossRef
A scoping review of the experience of implementing population testing for SARS-CoV-2 C.R. Foster, F. Campbell, L. Blank, A.J. Cantrell, M. Black, A.C.K. Lee Public Health.2021; 198: 22. CrossRef
How we should respond to the Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 outbreak: A German perspective F. Jung, V. Krieger, F.T. Hufert, J.-H. Küpper Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation.2020; 74(4): 363. CrossRef
Can the UK emulate the South Korean approach to covid-19? Azeem Majeed, Yongseok Seo, Kyungmoo Heo, Daejoong Lee BMJ.2020; : m2084. CrossRef
Innovative countermeasures can maintain cancer care continuity during the coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic in Korea Soohyeon Lee, Ah-reum Lim, Min Ja Kim, Yoon Ji Choi, Ju Won Kim, Kyong Hwa Park, Sang Won Shin, Yeul Hong Kim European Journal of Cancer.2020; 136: 69. CrossRef
Effect of COVID‐19 on liver transplantation in Korea Jeong‐Moo Lee Transplant Infectious Disease.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Outcomes of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Drive-Through Screening at an Academic Military Medical Center David A Lindholm, John L Kiley, Nathan K Jansen, Robert T Hoard, Matthew R Bondaryk, Elizabeth M Stanley, Gadiel R Alvarado, Ana E Markelz, Robert J Cybulski, Jason F Okulicz Open Forum Infectious Diseases.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Policies and innovations to battle Covid-19 – A case study of South Korea Doowon Lee, Bobae Choi Health Policy and Technology.2020; 9(4): 587. CrossRef
Lessons learnt from easing COVID-19 restrictions: an analysis of countries and regions in Asia Pacific and Europe Emeline Han, Melisa Mei Jin Tan, Eva Turk, Devi Sridhar, Gabriel M Leung, Kenji Shibuya, Nima Asgari, Juhwan Oh, Alberto L García-Basteiro, Johanna Hanefeld, Alex R Cook, Li Yang Hsu, Yik Ying Teo, David Heymann, Helen Clark, Martin McKee, Helena Legido-Q The Lancet.2020; 396(10261): 1525. CrossRef
COVID-19: challenges and opportunities Adam J Singer, Bettina C Fries Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine.2020; 7(3): 141. CrossRef
Emergency Department Overcrowding: A Retrospective Spatial Analysis and the Geocoding of Accesses. A Pilot Study in Rome Cristiano Pesaresi, Giuseppe Migliara, Davide Pavia, Corrado De Vito ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information.2020; 9(10): 579. CrossRef
COVID-19 pandemic's effects on the quality of pregnant women's emergency treatment: Review of two cases from a medical center in northern Taiwan Wen-Han Chang Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.2020; 59(6): 795. CrossRef
A conceptual framework for Emergency department design in a pandemic Gayathri Devi Nadarajan, Eunizar Omar, Benjamin S. Abella, Pei Shan Hoe, Sang Do Shin, Matthew Huei-Ming Ma, Marcus Eng Hock Ong Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
COVID-19, flattening the curve: recommendations towards control and managing a second wave Iziegbe Fenemigho, Ewaenosa Ukponmwan, Elizabeth C Nnakwue, Iboro Udoete, Chisom Asuzu, Adeleye Adaralegbe, Utibe Effiong Journal of Global Health Reports.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Objective The quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score, which includes mentation, systolic blood pressure, and respiratory rate, was developed to identify serious sepsis in out-of-hospital or emergency department (ED) settings. We evaluated the ability of the qSOFA score to predict poor outcome in South Korean ED patients with suspected infection.
Methods The qSOFA score was calculated for adult ED patients with suspected infection. Patients who received intravenous or oral antibiotics in the ED were considered to have infection. In-hospital mortality rate, admission rate, intensive care unit (ICU) admission rate, length of hospital stay (LOS), and lactate levels were compared between the qSOFA score groups. Receiver operating characteristic curves and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values for in-hospital mortality were calculated according to qSOFA cut-off points and lactate levels.
Results Of 2,698 patients, in-hospital mortality occurred in 134 (5.0%). The mortality rate increased with increasing qSOFA score (2.2%, 6.4%, 17.5%, and 42.4% for qSOFA scores 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively, P<0.001). The admission rate, ICU admission rate, LOS, and lactate level also increased with increasing qSOFA score (all P<0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values for predicting in-hospital mortality associated with qSOFA score, lactate ≥2 mmol/L, and lactate ≥4 mmol/L were 0.719 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.670 to 0.768), 0.657 (95% CI, 0.603 to 0.710), and 0.632 (95% CI, 0.571 to 0.693), respectively.
Conclusion Patients with a higher qSOFA score had higher admission, ICU admission, and in-hospital mortality rates, longer LOS, and higher lactate level. The qSOFA score showed better performance for predicting poor outcome than lactate level.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Clinical utility of biomarkers for outcomes prediction in adults with suspected sepsis presenting to the emergency department: a synthesis of current evidence Mari Imamura, Sinead N Duggan, Thenmalar Vadiveloo, Jamie G Cooper, Callum T Kaye, Paul Manson, Gianni Virgili, Lorna Aucott, Mike Clarke, Miriam Brazzelli Health Technology Assessment.2026; : 1. CrossRef
Outcome-Specific Prognostic Performance of Pneumonia Severity Assessment Tools for Predicting a Spectrum of Multiple Clinical Events Abuzer Özkan, Ahmet Taha Özatak, Soner Yeşilyurt Bratislava Medical Journal.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
The Role of qSOFA, Derived Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio, MEWS, and PIRO Scores in Predicting the Severity of Odontogenic Infections in Young and Adult Patients Serban Talpos Niculescu, Robert Avramut, Tareq Hajaj, Raluca Maracineanu, Antonis Perdiou, Roxana Talpos Niculescu, Marius Pricop, Horatiu Urechescu, Florin Urtila, Roxana Radu, Nicoleta Nikolajevic Stoican, Malina Popa Biomedicines.2025; 13(3): 532. CrossRef
Sodium level in patients with sepsis: what is the predictive value? Zain Sayed, Ahmed A. Obiedallah, Soheir M. Kasem, Abdelraouf M.S. Abdelraouf, Kareem S.M. Ismail, Alaa O. Ahmed Research and Opinion in Anesthesia & Intensive Care.2025; 12(1): 35. CrossRef
Lactate Enhanced Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score (Lqsofa) as a Tool to Predict the Prognosis in Patients of Sepsis in Surgical Intensive Care Unit Akash Sharma, Nitin Garg, Rahul Patel, Pooja Sharma International Journal of Recent Surgical and Medical Sciences.2025; 11: e015. CrossRef
Comparative analysis of Glasgow Coma Scale, quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment, base excess, and lactate for mortality prediction in critically ill emergency department patients Gürbüz Meral, Şenol Ardıç, Serkan Günay, Kadir Güzel, Ahmet Köse, Hülya Gençbay Durmuş, Serhat Uysal, Aydın Coşkun Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine.2024; 24(4): 231. CrossRef
First
Prev
