Objective Optimal training methods remain controversial for rarely performed emergency procedures. Previous research has failed to demonstrate the superiority or inferiority of live anesthetized animal models (LAA) as compared to other modalities. Most of the data on LAA use comes from military contexts; less information is available for civilian emergency medicine (EM) training. We sought to characterize the prevalence of LAA use among civilian EM residency programs and reasons for its use or discontinuation.
Methods Survey study of program directors of EM residency programs accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. A 16-item questionnaire was electronically delivered to program directors, including program region, current and historical use of LAA, and attitudes regarding the optimal procedural training modalities.
Results Of 179 survey recipients, 83 completed the survey (46.4%). Twelve programs (14.3%) currently use LAA, and 17 programs (20.5%) report previous LAA use. Reasons for discontinuing LAA use included ethical concerns, financial and logistical limitations, political pressures, and feeling that there were superior or equivalent alternative models available. Programs that currently use LAA were more likely to rank LAA as being the most preferable training modality while programs that do not currently use LAA were more likely to rank human cadavers as the most preferable modality.
Conclusion Despite a lack of data showing educational outcomes-driven differences between LAA and alternative training models, LAA use is declining among civilian EM residencies. Despite this, disagreement exists among programs that do and do not use LAA regarding the most optimal procedural training.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Considering the ethics of live tissue training in trauma surgery Cara Swain, Rory Rickard, Klas Karlgren, Gert Helgesson Journal of Medical Ethics.2026; 52(8): 552. CrossRef
Which questions about programs’ nonhuman animal use should medical students ask during residency interviews? Donya Mand Global Surgical Education - Journal of the Association for Surgical Education.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
How do medical professionals justify their involvement with live tissue training? C. S. Swain, G. Helgesson BMC Medical Ethics.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Is Training With Animals Needed? Rachel E. Hollyoak, Chris L. Foteff, Alun Cameron, Ann Scott, Guy J. Maddern ANZ Journal of Surgery.2025; 95(12): 2440. CrossRef
Trauma surgical simulation: discussing the replacement of live animals used as human patient simulators Cara Swain, Natalia Stathakarou, Pilar Alzuguren, Vincent Lemarteleur, Ryan Moffatt, Klas Karlgren Advances in Simulation.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
3-Dimensional printing for training in emergency medicine Getaw Worku Hassen, Jason Hill, Evan Yates, Anisha Duvvi, Roger Chirurgi, Mohammad Ganji, Jaspreet Singh, Ceilim Kim, Misagh Fasazadeh, Selome F. Yewedalsew, Shterna Seligson, Hossein Kalantari Annals of 3D Printed Medicine.2024; 15: 100158. CrossRef
A Systematic Review of Live Animal Use as a Simulation Modality (“Live Tissue Training”) in the Emergency Management of Trauma C.S. Swain, H.M.L Cohen, G. Helgesson, R.F. Rickard, K. Karlgren Journal of Surgical Education.2023; 80(9): 1320. CrossRef
Objective Electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation skills are of critical importance for diagnostic accuracy and patient safety. In our emergency department (ED), senior third-year emergency medicine residents (EM3s) are the initial interpreters of all ED ECGs. While this is an integral part of emergency medicine education, the accuracy of ECG interpretation is unknown. We aimed to review the adverse quality assurance (QA) events associated with ECG interpretation by EM3s.
Methods We conducted a retrospective study of all ED ECGs performed between October 2015 and October 2018, which were read primarily by EM3s, at an urban tertiary care medical center treating 56,000 patients per year. All cases referred to the ED QA committee during this time were reviewed. Cases involving a perceived error were referred to a 20-member committee of ED leadership staff, attendings, residents, and nurses for further consensus review. Ninety-five percent confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.
Results EM3s read 92,928 ECGs during the study period. Of the 3,983 total ED QA cases reviewed, errors were identified in 268 (6.7%; 95% CI, 6.0%–7.6%). Four of the 268 errors involved ECG misinterpretation or failure to act on an ECG abnormality by a resident (1.5%; 95% CI, 0.0%–2.9%).
Conclusion A small percentage of the cases referred to the QA committee were a result of EM3 misinterpretation of ECGs. The majority of emergency medicine residencies do not include the senior resident as a primary interpreter of ECGs. These findings support the use of EM3s as initial ED ECG interpreters to increase their clinical exposure.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Does Inclusion of Emergency Medicine (EM) Residents in ECG Screening for STEMI Change the Time to Catheterization Lab Activation? Sarah Aly, Kelsey Coolahan, Kirk Tomlinson, Duncan Grossman, Joseph Bove, Steven Hochman Critical Pathways in Cardiology: A Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine.2023; 22(2): 50. CrossRef
Objective The point-of-care ultrasound of the airway (POCUS-A) is a useful examination method but there are currently no educational programs for medical students regarding it. We designed a POCUS-A training curriculum for medical students to improve three cognitive and psychomotor learning domains: knowledge of POCUS-A, image acquisition, and image interpretation.
Methods Two hours of training were provided to 52 medical students in their emergency medicine (EM) rotation. Students were evaluated for cognitive and psychomotor skills before and immediately after the training. The validity measures were established with the help of six specialists and eight EM residents. A survey was administered following the curriculum.
Results Cognitive skill significantly improved after the training (38.7±12.4 vs. 91.2±7.7) and there was no significant difference between medical students and EM residents in posttest scores (91.2±7.7 vs. 90.8±4.6). The success rate of overall POCUS-A performance was 95.8%. The students were confident to perform POCUS-A on an actual patient and strongly agreed to incorporate POCUS-A training in their medical school curriculum.
Conclusion Cognitive and psychomotor skills of POCUS-A among medical students can be improved via a limited curriculum on EM rotation.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Airway Management Daniele Salvatore Paternò, Luigi La Via, Emilia Lo Giudice, Mario Lentini, Antonino Maniaci, Antoinette Marie Bonaccorso, Rossella Moltisanti, Antonio Putaggio, Federico Pappalardo, Massimiliano Sorbello Journal of Clinical Medicine.2026; 15(7): 2726. CrossRef
Neurosonology education for undergraduate medical students in South Korea Hong Jun Kim, Jay Chol Choi Journal of Medicine and Life Science.2025; 22(1): 8. CrossRef
Status and perception of point-of-care ultrasound education in Korean medical schools: A national cross-sectional study Jonghoon Yoo, Soo Yeon Kang, Ik Joon Jo, Taerim Kim, Gun Tak Lee, Jong Eun Park, Se Uk Lee, Sung Yeon Hwang, Won Chul Cha, Tae Gun Shin, Young Soon Cho, Hyewon Jang, Hee Yoon Medicine.2024; 103(18): e38026. CrossRef
New International Guidelines and Consensus on the Use of Lung Ultrasound Libertario Demi, Frank Wolfram, Catherine Klersy, Annalisa De Silvestri, Virginia Valeria Ferretti, Marie Muller, Douglas Miller, Francesco Feletti, Marcin Wełnicki, Natalia Buda, Agnieszka Skoczylas, Andrzej Pomiecko, Domagoj Damjanovic, Robert Olszewski Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine.2023; 42(2): 309. CrossRef
Ultrasonography in undergraduate medical education: a comprehensive review and the education program implemented at Jichi Medical University Toru Kameda, Nobuyuki Taniguchi, Kei Konno, Harumi Koibuchi, Kiyoka Omoto, Kouichi Itoh Journal of Medical Ultrasonics.2022; 49(2): 217. CrossRef
A consensus list of ultrasound competencies for graduating emergency medicine residents David A. Haidar, William J. Peterson, Patrick G. Minges, Jennifer Carnell, Jason T. Nomura, John Bailitz, Jeremy S. Boyd, Megan M. Leo, E. Liang Liu, Youyou Duanmu, Josie Acuña, Ross Kessler, Marco F. Elegante, Mathew Nelson, Rachel B. Liu, Resa E. Lewiss AEM Education and Training.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
First
Prev
