Head injury is a common presenting complaint amongst emergency department patients. To date, there has been no widespread utilization of neuro-biomarkers to aid the diagnosis of traumatic brain injury. This review article explores which neuro-biomarkers could be used in the emergency department in aiding the clinical diagnosis of mild traumatic brain injury. Based on the available evidence, the most promising neuro-biomarkers appear to be Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and Ubiquitin C-Terminal Hydrolase Isozyme L1 (UCH-L1) as these show significant rises in peripheral blood levels shortly after injury and these have been demonstrated to correlate with long-term clinical outcomes. Treatment strategies for minor traumatic brain injury in the emergency department setting are not well developed. The introduction of blood neuro-biomarkers could reduce unnecessary radiation exposure and provide an opportunity to improve the care of this patient group.
Neuro-biomarkers are not widely used currently to aid the diagnosis of traumatic brain injury in the emergency department.
What is new in the current study
Based on available evidence, the most promising biomarkers which could be used in the emergency department to aid in the diagnosis of traumatic brain injury are ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase isozyme L1 and glial fibrillary acid protein.
INTRODUCTION
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is defined as a traumatically-induced structural brain injury or physiological disruption of brain function caused by an external force [1]. Brain injuries can be classified into mild, moderate, and severe categories. Primarily, this classification is based upon the patient’s level of consciousness within the first 24 hours. For a patient to be diagnosed with mild TBI (mTBI) they must have normal structural imaging of the brain (such as computed tomography, CT). In addition, patients with mTBI cannot have experienced a period of loss of consciousness for more than 30 minutes, reduced consciousness for more than 24 hours, post-traumatic amnesia lasting more than 24 hours or an initial Glasgow coma score of below 13 in the first 24 hours following a head injury [1]. Symptoms of mTBI can include headache, nausea, tinnitus, hypersensitivity to light, confusion and other cognitive disturbances.
Head injury is one of the commonest reasons for emergency department (ED) attendance worldwide. Yet, mTBI is often overlooked by clinical teams, as it is not easily identified in the acute setting. The injuries sustained by patients with mTBI are often seen as “not severe” by clinical staff, who may be falsely reassured by negative CT imaging. Consequently, patients with mTBI are often discharged from the ED with basic written instructions, and little in the way of treatment. However, 15% of patients with mTBI will experience symptoms for more than one year following injury [2]. Di Battista et al. [3], Huang et al. [4], and Zetterberg and Blennow [5] have previously reviewed the utility of neuro-biomarkers in assessing patients with TBI. We believe this is the first review looking specifically at the potential utility of neuro-biomarkers in the ED setting.
The assessment of patients with suspected TBI often relies upon neurological imaging such as CT scanning and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, CT has a low sensitivity for mTBI and exposes the patient to a significant dose of radiation. Conversely, MRI can provide information on the extent of cerebral parenchymal injury, but its availability in the acute setting is limited.
Most patients with mTBI present to the ED for care, but unlike other organ-based diseases, such as myocardial infarction, the clinical utilization of blood biomarkers to facilitate rapid diagnosis and treatment of mTBI is not commonplace. Consequently, the true incidence and characteristics of such patients are not known [6].
This review article aims to explore which neuro-biomarkers could be used in the ED in aiding the diagnosis of mTBI.
BIOMARKERSAstrocyte injury biomarkers
Astrocytes are characteristic star-shaped, non-neuronal cells that provide support and protection for the neurones of the nervous system. They have many functions, including the provision of biochemical support to the endothelial cells that form the blood-brain barrier, biochemical and nutrient regulation of the neurones and play a part in repair and scarring processes in the central nervous system following injury. There are two biomarkers that can be used to measure astrocyte injury: S100β and glial fibrillary acidic protein.
S100β
S100β is a calcium-binding protein found mainly in the cytosol of astrocytes and Schwann cells [7]. It can also be found in extraneural sites, such as chondrocytes and fat cells [8,9]. The S100β protein is eliminated by renal excretion and has a half-life of 30 minutes to 2 hours [10-12]. Levels are measurable in serum, urine and cerebrospinal fluid [11].
Several studies have found significant correlation between elevated blood levels of S100β and abnormalities on CT imaging of the brain [13-15]. Biberthaler et al. [14] proposed that combining the measurement of S100β with a clinical decision-making tool for mTBI could reduce the number of CT scan requests by 30%. However, other investigators have not been able to reproduce this correlation consistently [16-18].
Elevated serum levels of S100β have been associated with an increased incidence of post-concussion syndrome and transient impairment of cognition following trauma [19,20]. Other studies have reported that raised serum levels of S100β are associated with post-traumatic abnormalities on MRI and with symptomatic neuropsychological disturbances [21,22].
Elevated levels of S100β have also been identified in polytrauma patients without head injuries which raises questions about the specificity of S100β [23-26]. Nygren De Boussard et al. [27] demonstrated a sensitivity of S100β for mTBI when compared with patients with orthopaedic injury without head injury of 61% (95% confidence interval, 49% to 73%) and a specificity of 77% (95% confidence interval, 62% to 93%).
Glial fibrillary acidic protein
Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) is an astrocyte structural protein. Vos et al. [28] demonstrated an association between GFAP levels in patients with severe and moderate TBI and similarly raised levels were associated with adverse outcomes 6 months after injury. In addition, Metting et al. [29] demonstrated that serum GFAP was increased in TBI patients with abnormal CT scans and also demonstrated that GFAP was elevated in patients with axonal injury on MRI three months post injury.
In a study by Papa et al. [30], GFAP was detectable in serum less than 1 hour after head injury and it was able to reliably distinguish between trauma patients with mTBI and those without head injury. In this same study, blood GFAP levels were elevated in patients with traumatic intracranial abnormalities on CT compared with those patients without lesions and it could also be used to predict those patients who required neurosurgical intervention.
Papa et al. [31] directly compared the performance of GFAP with S100β in a cohort of trauma patients presenting to a level I trauma center. In this study of 397 patients, both GFAP and S100β demonstrated a rapid appearance in serum post-injury with levels detectible within an hour of injury. However, levels of S100β were found to be significantly higher in patients with fractures, compared with those who did not, irrespective of whether the patient had a TBI (P<0.001). Conversely, GFAP levels were not affected by the presence of fractures (P>0.05). The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve for predicting traumatic intracranial lesions on CT for S100β was 0.78 (0.67 to 0.89) and GFAP was 0.84 (0.73 to 0.95).
Axonal injury biomarkers
An axon is a long, willowy projection of a neurone that conducts electrical impulses away from the neuron’s cell body. There are three biomarkers that can be used to measure axonal injury: alpha-II spectrin breakdown products (SBDPs), tau proteins, and neurofilaments.
Alpha-II SBDPs
Alpha-II spectrin is the major structural component of the axonal cytoskeleton [32,33]. Levels of SBDPs in cerebrospinal fluid have been shown to rise in adults with severe TBI and they have shown a significant relationship with the severity of injury and clinical outcome [32-37].
Serum SBDPs have been measured in TBI patients and levels were significantly greater in subjects with moderate and severe TBI than in control patients [38]. However, this relationship was not demonstrated in patients with mTBI.
Tau proteins
Tau is an intracellular protein involved with the assembling of axonal microtubule bundles and axonal transport [39]. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of tau protein molecules that have been proteolytically cleaved (c-Tau) are significantly elevated following TBI and these levels correlate with clinical outcome [40,41]. Unlike CSF, c-Tau and total tau protein levels in peripheral blood have been shown to be a poor predictor of traumatic lesions on CT and postconcussion syndrome [42-44].
Neurofilaments
Neurofilaments are components of the neurone cytoskeleton. Following TBI, calcium influx into the cell triggers a phosphorylation cascade that contributes to axonal injury [45]. Elevated levels of hyperphosphorylated neurofilaments (p-NF) have been found in the CSF of patients with severe TBI compared with controls [46]. Similarly, p-NF levels in venous blood have been shown to correlate with the severity of TBI in children [47]. Gatson et al. [48] compared the p-NF serum levels in patients with mTBI and healthy controls. They demonstrated that mTBI patients exhibited a significant increase in the serum levels of p-NF on days 1 (P<0.001) and 3 (P<0.001) following injury and the area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for p-NF in mTBI was 100% at both 24 and 72 hours post injury. Early work in animals demonstrated a serum rise in p-NF 6 hours after injury, with levels peaking at 24 to 48 hours before they gradually returned to baseline [49]. This 6-hour lag between the onset of injury and the rise in blood levels of p-NF may limit the usefulness of this biomarker as an aid to diagnosis in the acute setting. However, it may be a useful biomarker when used for prognostic purposes. Anderson et al. [49] demonstrated that levels measured between 48 to 96 hours post injury may be used to predict patient outcomes.
Neuronal injury biomarkers
A neurone is a specialized type of cell found within the central and peripheral nervous systems. Neurones are electrically excitable which process and transmit electrical and chemical signals. They interface with adjacent neurones by means of synapses to form neural networks. There are two biomarkers that can be used to measure neuronal injury: neurone specific enolase (NSE) and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase isozyme L1 (UCH-L1).
NSE
NSE is an enzyme found in neuronal cell bodies throughout the nervous system. It is located in other non-neuronal sites, most notably erythrocytes. It has been shown to be elevated after neurone injury [50]. In patients with severe TBI, blood levels of NSE at 72 hours post injury showed an association with adverse outcomes [51].
Several reports on blood NSE measurement in patients with mTBI have been published, but most conclude that serum NSE appears to have limited utility as a marker of neuronal injury [50,52-55], particularly as hemolysis appears to cause false positive results [56,57].
UCH-L1
UCH-L1 is a protein which is involved in the metabolism of ubiquitin within neurones [58]. Increases in blood UCH-L1 has been detected in the serum of mild and moderate TBI patients within an hour of injury [59]. Levels taken within 4 hours of injury were significantly higher in those with TBI lesions on CT than those with a normal intracranial appearance at CT. Blood levels of UCH-L1 have been demonstrated to be able to discriminate between mTBI patients from patients without head injuries and, similar to GFAP, UCH-L1 levels were much higher in patients who required neurosurgical intervention [59].
Takala et al. [60] compared serum UCH-L1 and GFAP levels in a prospective trail of 324 patients with TBI. Patients with full recovery and more favourable outcomes (as measured by the Glasgow Outcome Score) had significantly lower UCH-L1 and GFAP levels in the 48 hours immediately following injury.
DISCUSSION
Until recently, most studies examining neuro-biomarkers had focused on severe TBI. However, as more than 80% of patients with neurological injury have mTBI there is a growing need for a rapid and reliable neuro-biomarker test to aid emergency physicians with diagnosis in this patient group [61,62].
This review identifies a number of neuro-biomarkers which could potentially be used in mainstream clinical practice to facilitate the diagnosis of patients with mTBI. It is our belief that for a neuro-biomarker to be usable in the ED to diagnose mTBI it must fulfil the following criteria: 1) levels must be measurable in peripheral blood shortly after the onset of injury, 2) the test should have sufficient sensitivity to be able to diagnose mTBI, and 3) levels are unaffected by non-head trauma.
Based on these criteria, the most promising neuro-biomarkers appear to be GFAP and UCH-L1 as these show significant level rises in peripheral blood shortly after injury and and the levels are unaffected by non-head trauma. Additionally, both have been demonstrated to correlate with long-term clinical outcomes. It appears that GFAP has a consistent ability to detect TBI over the 7 days following injury, whereas UCH-L1 seems to be limited to the early post injury period [63].
Diaz-Arrastia et al. [64] recognised that UCH-L1 and GFAP measure separate, distinct molecular events following TBI, and hypothesized that analyzing both biomarkers simultaneously would be superior to studying either biomarker individually. In a cohort of 206 patients with TBI the two biomarkers in isolation had good sensitivity for discriminating between TBI patients and healthy controls (the area under the curve for receiver operator characteristic analysis was 0.87 and 0.91 for UCH-L1 and GFAP, respectively). Combining the biomarkers led to superior sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing TBI (area under the curve 0.94) [64]. This evidence was supported by Papa et al. [63] who demonstrated that a combination of GFAP and UCH-L1 neuro-biomarkers marginally outperformed GFAP used on its own.
S100β has poor sensitivity and specificity [27] and is adversely affected by the presence of orthopaedic trauma in the absence of head injury, which is likely to limit its clinical utility in the emergency setting [23-26].
The utility of NSE in the ED setting is limited by the delay in the rise in peripheral blood levels following injury [51]. Similarly, p-NF has a significant lag from the time of injury to the rise in peripheral blood [49]. This is likely to limit the usefulness of both of these neuro-biomarkers in the acute diagnosis of mTBI. However, they may become useful prognostic markers in the future.
Although CSF levels of c-Tau protein molecules are significantly elevated following TBI, c-Tau levels in peripheral blood do not correlate with the presence of traumatic lesions on CT. This is likely to limit its usefulness in the diagnosis of mTBI in the ED [42-44]. SBDP levels are raised in peripheral blood in moderate and severe TBI, however this relationship has not been reproduced in patients with mTBI [38].
Other biomarkers, not specific to the nervous system, such as free DNA [65], interleukins [66], d-dimer [67], neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin [68] and cytochrome C [69] have been previously studied in the field of brain injury. Despite being outside the scope of this neuro-biomarkers review, we feel that with further development these general biomarkers could potentially be mTBI biomarkers in the future.
CONCLUSION
Currently, the most promising neuro-biomarkers for use to aid in the diagnosis of mTBI in the ED are GFAP and UCH-L1 as these are raised in peripheral blood shortly after injury in patients with mTBI and the levels are unaffected by non-head trauma. Utilization of a peripheral blood neuro-biomarker, such as GFAP and UCH-L1, in the ED are likely to facilitate earlier diagnosis of mTBI and potentially reduce the number of CT scans performed.
Alastair Jones has no conflict of interests. Paul Jarvis is an employee of Abbott Point of Care, which develops and sells diagnostic assays commercially and is presently developing traumatic brain injury assays.
REFERENCESO’NeilMECarlsonKStorzbachDWashington, DCUS Department of Veterans Affairs2013AlexanderMPMild traumatic brain injury: pathophysiology, natural history, and clinical management199545125360Di BattistaAPRhindSGBakerAJApplication of blood-based biomarkers in human mild traumatic brain injury2013444HuangWLiSXLiXJXuHYAdvances in biomarkers of mild traumatic brain injury in cerebrospinal fluid and blood2015314669ZetterbergHBlennowKFluid markers of traumatic brain injury20156699102BaughCMStammJMRileyDOChronic traumatic encephalopathy: neurodegeneration following repetitive concussive and subconcussive brain trauma2012624454XiongHLiangWLWuXRPathophysiological alterations in cultured astrocytes exposed to hypoxia/reoxygenation20003121721ZimmerDBCornwallEHLandarASongWThe S100 protein family: history, function, and expression19953741729OlssonBZetterbergHHampelHBlennowKBiomarker-based dissection of neurodegenerative diseases20119552034Egea-GuerreroJJRevuelto-ReyJMurillo-CabezasFAccuracy of the S100β protein as a marker of brain damage in traumatic brain injury2012267682Rodriguez-RodriguezAEgea-GuerreroJJLeon-JustelARole of S100B protein in urine and serum as an early predictor of mortality after severe traumatic brain injury in adults201241422833TownendWDibbleCAbidKVailASherwoodRLeckyFRapid elimination of protein S-100B from serum after minor head trauma20062314955IngebrigtsenTRomnerBMarup-JensenSThe clinical value of serum S-100 protein measurements in minor head injury: a Scandinavian multicentre study200014104755BiberthalerPLinsenmeierUPfeiferKJSerum S-100B concentration provides additional information fot the indication of computed tomography in patients after minor head injury: a prospective multicenter study20062544653MullerKTownendWBiascaNS100B serum level predicts computed tomography findings after minor head injury20076214526PhillipsJPJonesHMHitchcockRAdamaNThompsonRJRadioimmunoassay of serum creatine kinase BB as index of brain damage after head injury19802817779BechtelKFrasureSMarshallCDziuraJSimpsonCRelationship of serum S100B levels and intracranial injury in children with closed head trauma2009124e697704PiazzaOStortiMPCotenaSS100B is not a reliable prognostic index in paediatric TBI20074325864IngebrigtsenTRomnerBManagement of minor head injuries in hospitals in Norway199795515WaterlooKIngebrigtsenTRomnerBNeuropsychological function in patients with increased serum levels of protein S-100 after minor head injury19971392631IngebrigtsenTRomnerBSerial S-100 protein serum measurements related to early magnetic resonance imaging after minor head injury1996859458IngebrigtsenTWaterlooKJacobsenEALangbakkBRomnerBTraumatic brain damage in minor head injury: relation of serum S-100 protein measurements to magnetic resonance imaging and neurobehavioral outcome19994546875AndersonREHanssonLONilssonODijlai-MerzougRSettergrenGHigh serum S100B levels for trauma patients without head injuries20014812558RothoerlRDWoertgenCHigh serum S100B levels for trauma patients without head injuries20014914901PelinkaLEKroepflASchmidhammerRGlial fibrillary acidic protein in serum after traumatic brain injury and multiple trauma200457100612RomnerBIngebrigtsenTHigh serum S100B levels for trauma patients without head injuries2001491490Nygren De BoussardCFredmanPLundinAAnderssonKEdmanGBorgJS100 in mild traumatic brain injury20041867183VosPEJacobsBAndriessenTMGFAP and S100B are biomarkers of traumatic brain injury: an observational cohort study201075178693MettingZWilczakNRodigerLASchaafJMvan der NaaltJGFAP and S100B in the acute phase of mild traumatic brain injury201278142833PapaLLewisLMFalkJLElevated levels of serum glial fibrillary acidic protein breakdown products in mild and moderate traumatic brain injury are associated with intracranial lesions and neurosurgical intervention20125947183PapaLSilvestriSBrophyGMGFAP out-performs S100β in detecting traumatic intracranial lesions on computed tomography in trauma patients with mild traumatic brain injury and those with extracranial lesions201431181522GoodmanSRZimmerWEClarkMBZagonISBarkerJEBloomMLBrain spectrin: of mice and men199536593606RiedererBMZagonISGoodmanSRBrain spectrin(240/235) and brain spectrin(240/235E): two distinct spectrin subtypes with different locations within mammalian neural cells1986102208897FarkasOPolgarBSzekeres-BarthoJDocziTPovlishockJTBukiASpectrin breakdown products in the cerebrospinal fluid in severe head injury: preliminary observations200514785561CardaliSMaugeriRDetection of alphaII-spectrin and breakdown products in humans after severe traumatic brain injury2006502531PinedaJALewisSBValadkaABClinical significance of alphaII-spectrin breakdown products in cerebrospinal fluid after severe traumatic brain injury20072435466MondelloSPapaLBukiANeuronal and glial markers are differently associated with computed tomography findings and outcome in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a case control study201115R156BergerRPHayesRLRichichiRBeersSRWangKKSerum concentrations of ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 and αIIspectrin breakdown product 145 kDa correlate with outcome after pediatric TBI2012291627TeunissenCEDijkstraCPolmanCBiological markers in CSF and blood for axonal degeneration in multiple sclerosis200543241ZemlanFPJauchECMulchaheyJJC-tau biomarker of neuronal damage in severe brain injured patients: association with elevated intracranial pressure and clinical outcome20029471319ShawGJJauchECZemlanFPSerum cleaved tau protein levels and clinical outcome in adult patients with closed head injury2002392547BazarianJJZemlanFPMookerjeeSStigbrandTSerum S100B and cleaved-tau are poor predictors of long-term outcome after mild traumatic brain injury20062075965MaMLindsellCJRosenberryCMShawGJZemlanFPSerum cleaved tau does not predict postconcussion syndrome after mild traumatic brain injury2008267638OstMNylenKCsajbokLInitial CSF total tau correlates with 1-year outcome in patients with traumatic brain injury20066716004BukiAPovlishockJTAll roads lead to disconnection?: traumatic axonal injury revisited200614818193SimanRToraskarNDangAA panel of neuron-enriched proteins as markers for traumatic brain injury in humans200926186777ZurekJBartlovaLFedoraMHyperphosphorylated neurofilament NF-H as a predictor of mortality after brain injury in children2011252216GatsonJWBarillasJHynanLSDiaz-ArrastiaRWolfSEMineiJPDetection of neurofilament-H in serum as a diagnostic tool to predict injury severity in patients who have suffered mild traumatic brain injury201412112328AndersonKJScheffSWMillerKMThe phosphorylated axonal form of the neurofilament subunit NF-H (pNF-H) as a blood biomarker of traumatic brain injury200825107985SkogseidIMNordbyHKUrdalPPausELilleaasFIncreased serum creatine kinase BB and neuron specific enolase following head injury indicates brain damage199211510611ChabokSYMoghadamADSaneeiZAmlashiFGLeiliEKAmiriZMNeuron-specific enolase and S100BB as outcome predictors in severe diffuse axonal injury20127216547ErgunRBostanciUAkdemirGPrognostic value of serum neuron-specific enolase levels after head injury19982041820FridrikssonTKiniNWalsh-KellyCHennesHSerum neuronspecific enolase as a predictor of intracranial lesions in children with head trauma: a pilot study2000781620RossSACunninghamRTJohnstonCFRowlandsBJNeuronspecific enolase as an aid to outcome prediction in head injury1996104716YamazakiYYadaKMoriiSKitaharaTOhwadaTDiagnostic significance of serum neuron-specific enolase and myelin basic protein assay in patients with acute head injury19954326770JohnssonPBlomquistSLuhrsCNeuron-specific enolase increases in plasma during and immediately after extracorporeal circulation2000697504RamontLThoannesHVolondatAChastangFMilletMCMaquartFXEffects of hemolysis and storage condition on neuron-specific enolase (NSE) in cerebrospinal fluid and serum: implications in clinical practice20054312157TongaonkarPChenLLambertsonDKoBMaduraKEvidence for an interaction between ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes and the 26S proteasome20002046918PapaLLewisLMSilvestriSSerum levels of ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase distinguish mild traumatic brain injury from trauma controls and are elevated in mild and moderate traumatic brain injury patients with intracranial lesions and neurosurgical intervention201272133544TakalaRSPostiJPRunttiHGlial fibrillary acidic protein and ubiquitin c-terminal hydrolase-l1 as outcome predictors in traumatic brain injury201687820Consensus ConferenceRehabilitation of persons with traumatic brain injury. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Rehabilitation of Persons with Traumatic Brain Injury199928297483YealyDMHoganDEImaging after head trauma. Who needs what?1991970717PapaLBrophyGMWelchRDTime course and diagnostic accuracy of glial and neuronal blood biomarkers GFAP and UCH-L1 in a large cohort of trauma patients with and without mild traumatic brain injury20167355160Diaz-ArrastiaRWangKKPapaLAcute biomarkers of traumatic brain injury: relationship between plasma levels of ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 and glial fibrillary acidic protein2014311925MacherHEgea-GuerreroJJRevuelto-ReyJRole of early cell-free DNA levels decrease as a predictive marker of fatal outcome after severe traumatic brain injury2012414127KossmannTHansVHImhofHGIntrathecal and serum interleukin-6 and the acute-phase response in patients with severe traumatic brain injuries199543117SwansonCABurnsJCPetersonBMLow plasma D-dimer concentration predicts the absence of traumatic brain injury in children20106810727ZhaoJChenHZhangMEarly expression of serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) is associated with neurological severity immediately after traumatic brain injury20163683928SullivanPGKellerJNBussenWLScheffSWCytochrome c release and caspase activation after traumatic brain injury20029498896