Skip to main navigation Skip to main content

CEEM : Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine

OPEN ACCESS
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Articles

Original Article
AI & Digital Health | Critical Care

Integrating the interpretable machine learning Score For Emergency Risk Prediction (SERP) with emergency department triage to better predict 30-Day mortality

Yvonne Wong Qi Feng1, Yohei Okada1,3,4, Stephanie Fook-Chong3, Yilin Ning5, Kennth Boon Kiat Tan1,2, Marcus Eng Hock Ong2,3
Available online: April 3, 2026
1Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
2Department of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
3Pre-hospital & Emergency Research Centre, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
4Department of Preventive Services, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
5Centre for Quantitative Medicine, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
Corresponding author:  Yvonne Wong Qi Feng,
Email: yvonne.wong.qi.feng@u.duke.nus.edu
Received: 22 October 2025   • Revised: 5 March 2026   • Accepted: 6 March 2026
Yvonne Wong Qi Feng and Yohei Okada contributed equally to this study as co-first authors.
  • 887 Views
  • 27 Download
  • 0 Crossref
  • 0 Scopus

OBJECTIVE
This study integrates a machine learning (ML) based Score for Emergency Risk Prediction (SERP), developed using objective mortality endpoints with the Patient Acuity Category Scale (PACS) and evaluated its effectiveness in clinical use.
METHODS
This single-centre, retrospective cohort study included all ED patients from a large tertiary hospital between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2019. Using a reclassification framework, SERP was incorporated into PACS to derive two enhanced triage models. PACS+ model 1 downtriaged patients with low predicted 30-day mortality risk and up-triaged those with high risk. PACS+ model 2 up-triaged only high-risk patients, while low-risk patients retained their original category. Predictive performance in the test cohort was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and decision curve analysis (DCA).
RESULTS
The derivation cohort included 97,188 ED visits, and test cohort included 97,212 ED visits. In the derivation set, the mean (SD) age of patients was 58.97 (18.41) years old and 47,993 (49.4%) were females. Of all patients, 19.9%, 57.5%, 22.5%, and 0.2% were triaged to PACS categories 1–4 respectively. The 30-day mortality rate in the derivation set was 2.8% and 2.7% in the validation cohort. For 30-day mortality prediction, PACS+ model 1 (AUC 0.828 [95% CI 0.820-0.836]) and PACS+ model 2 (AUC 0.812 [95% CI 0.805-0.818]) outperformed PACS (AUC 0.722 [95% CI 0.714-0.729]). PACS+ model 1 consistently achieved greater net benefit across the range of clinical thresholds.
CONCLUSION
Integrating ML-based SERP with PACS improved 30-day mortality prediction in ED triage.

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Integrating the interpretable machine learning Score For Emergency Risk Prediction (SERP) with emergency department triage to better predict 30-Day mortality
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Integrating the interpretable machine learning Score For Emergency Risk Prediction (SERP) with emergency department triage to better predict 30-Day mortality
Close