Skip to main navigation Skip to main content

CEEM : Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine

OPEN ACCESS
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Articles

Editorial
Critical Care

Future of sepsis: perspective on diagnosis

Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine 2022;9(4):269-270.
Published online: November 14, 2022

Department of Emergency Medicine, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, Korea

Correspondence to: Kyuseok Kim Department of Emergency Medicine, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, 59 Yatap-ro, Bundang-gu, Seongnam 13496, Korea E-mail: dreinstein70@gmail.com
• Received: October 30, 2022   • Revised: November 2, 2022   • Accepted: November 2, 2022

Copyright © 2022 The Korean Society of Emergency Medicine

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

  • 5,134 Views
  • 236 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 6 Crossref
  • 6 Scopus
next
Sepsis is a global burden with no specific treatment [1,2]. Traditional treatment has focused on macrocirculation and hyperinflammation, but none has been successful.
Sepsis is not a single disease but can have many phenotypes [3]. Regarding oxygen supply and consumption, three systems are important: macrocirculation, microcirculation, and mitochondria [4]. Macrocirculation comprises cardiac function and arterial resistance (compliance). Fluid resuscitation and vasoactive treatment target cardiac output and blood pressure, which are components of the macrocirculation. Microcirculation is important since it is the last path for oxygen to reach the cell. Even though the optimal macrocirculation targets (blood pressure and cardiac output) can be achieved, the oxygen might not be able to be used by the cell due to microcirculatory and/or mitochondrial dysfunction. In this way, analysis is limited by lack of a widely and clinically used diagnostic tool to monitor microcirculation and mitochondrial function. At the investigational level, there are monitoring devices for those purposes [5,6]. Additional treatment options could be developed with advancement of real-time monitoring of these three components. As in Fig. 1, different combinations of sepsis are possible according to the three systems, and treatment could be more personalized rather than using the “one-size-fits-all” concept.
Another potential issue in sepsis is inflammation status. The traditional approach to reduce hyperinflammation (i.e., cytokine storm) is not optimal, and opposing treatments to enhance immune function are becoming more common [7]. For example, anti-programmed death-1 (anti-PD-1)/anti-programmed death ligand-1 (anti-PDL1), interferon gamma, and interleukin-7 are being investigated. However, the spectrum of immune status of patients is not categorical and can be rating scale and compartment specific. Therefore, additional diagnostic approaches are needed.
Medical treatment is dependent on the specific diagnosis, which requires knowledge of in-depth pathophysiology. To improve treatment of sepsis, its in-depth pathophysiology must be better understood for ideal diagnosis and personalized treatment.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

FUNDING

None.

Fig. 1.
Conceptual model of types of sepsis. (A) Three systems of oxygen supply and consumption. (B) A variety of sepsis patients according to combinations of dysfunctions of the three systems. OCT, optical coherence tomography; OCR, oxygen consumption rate.
ceem-22-392f1.jpg
  • 1. Rudd KE, Johnson SC, Agesa KM, et al. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990-2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 2020;395:200-11.
  • 2. Kim J, Kim K, Lee H, Ahn S. Epidemiology of sepsis in Korea: a population-based study of incidence, mortality, cost and risk factors for death in sepsis. Clin Exp Emerg Med 2019;6:49-63.
  • 3. Cavaillon JM, Singer M, Skirecki T. Sepsis therapies: learning from 30 years of failure of translational research to propose new leads. EMBO Mol Med 2020;12:e10128.
  • 4. Mok G, Hendin A, Reardon P, Hickey M, Gray S, Yadav K. Macrocirculatory and microcirculatory endpoints in sepsis resuscitation. J Intensive Care Med 2021;36:1385-91.
  • 5. Edul VS, Enrico C, Laviolle B, Vazquez AR, Ince C, Dubin A. Quantitative assessment of the microcirculation in healthy volunteers and in patients with septic shock. Crit Care Med 2012;40:1443-8.
  • 6. Park JR, Lee B, Lee MJ, Kim K, Oh WY. Visualization of threedimensional microcirculation of rodents’ retina and choroid for studies of critical illness using optical coherence tomography angiography. Sci Rep 2021;11:14302.
  • 7. Delano MJ, Ward PA. The immune system’s role in sepsis progression, resolution, and long-term outcome. Immunol Rev 2016;274:330-53.

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Future of sepsis: perspective on diagnosis
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2022;9(4):269-270.   Published online November 14, 2022
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Future of sepsis: perspective on diagnosis
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2022;9(4):269-270.   Published online November 14, 2022
Close

Figure

  • 0
Future of sepsis: perspective on diagnosis
Image
Fig. 1. Conceptual model of types of sepsis. (A) Three systems of oxygen supply and consumption. (B) A variety of sepsis patients according to combinations of dysfunctions of the three systems. OCT, optical coherence tomography; OCR, oxygen consumption rate.
Future of sepsis: perspective on diagnosis